So the Pats took another step towards the Super Bowl (and a perfect season) by beating the Jags in Foxboro yesterday. Brady set another record too, for good measure, this time setting the passing accuracy mark at 92.9% surpassing the previous bests of 91.3% in a regular season game held by Vinny Testaverde and 88% in a playoff game held by Phil Simms (who was a commentator in the booth, by the way).
Moss was essentially a non-factor, though his one catch was a 4th down conversion to keep the first drive alive. I thought lots of players stepped up (as is usually the case), though I give special recognition to our running backs, particularly Kevin Faulk. He may not have had 100 yards like Maroney, but he made big plays when we needed them, and in my opinion is the most underrated part of the Patriots' offense.
Next in line: the Chargers, whom the Pats have beaten once this year already. They just put the finishing touches on a victory over the Colts in Indy, where Peyton Manning and company couldn't find a way to stop a San Diego offense that lost both Phillip Rivers and LaDanian Tomlinson during the game. Nice...
Adam Vinatieri, I told you you were making a mistake.
So I finally got around to watching "Balls of Fury", the 2007 sophomoric flick billed as "a huge comedy with tiny balls"...and you wonder why TLM didn't want to go see this at the theaters with me.
Well, it exceeded my expectations, and I was surprised my a few things. For example, I had no idea that the movie was essentially a spoof of to-the-death martial arts tournament movies like "Enter the Dragon" and "Mortal Kombat", except it's to-the-death ping-pong. Go figure.
[ On a side note, there's at least one actor who was actually in "Mortal Kombat" (Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa) and one who should have been (James Hong). ]
The main reason I wanted to see the picture, however, was to watch serious actor turned caricature of himself Christopher Walken play the part of Feng, the sillily evil grand master of the tournament. He did what I expected him to do; that is, talk in the oh-so-recognizable Christopher Walken way and steal the show. It didn't matter what getup he was in (this one was pretty out there), he's still that guy dancing around in the Fatboy Slim video for "Weapon of Choice" (is there anything this guy can't do? Oh, right, talk differently).
Walken had some strong competition, though, from relative newcomer Dan Fogler, who won't be receiving any Oscar nominations anytime soon but still gave a great performance with his deadpan, slapstick, Def Leppard shirt wearing character and hero, Randy Daytona.
Talk about silly holidays...Today is Peculiar People Day, a day for recognizing those among us who are quirky, bizarre, eccentric, weird, wacky, or maybe just slightly out of the ordinary for whatever reason. We all know (and probably work with) at least one, so be nice to them today, even if their socks don't match or they insist on (inappropriately) being on "hug patrol" all the time (you know who you are).
I was reminded recently of one of my favorite books, How to Win Friends and Influence People by Dale Carnegie, a staple in any business school's required readings and a must-read for anyone who works with people. Its usefulness extends to anyone, however, and though nothing in the book is necessarily new information, it is presented in a way that comes across clearly and insightfully.
Some might say it's a compendium in basic human psychology, while others might see it as manipulation 101 (the inclusion of the word "Influence" in the title is certainly suggestive). I look at it much more innocently and take it for what it is: one man's advice on how to interact with others. Without a doubt, I recommend reading it, no matter who you are.
The book is broken down into four major sections, and in each one Carnegie presents ideas that seem old-hat, then hammers them home with tons of examples that firm up the real power behind them. At the end of each section he lists off those ideas in a summary he calls "In a Nutshell", meant for easy review. I've been meaning to list these off somewhere for a while now, just so I have somewhere a little more convenient than the book itself to look them over again. So, here are Dale Carnegie's "In a Nutshell" summaries as listed in his book:
Fundamental Techniques in Handling People
Don't criticize, condemn or complain.
Give honest and sincere appreciation.
Arouse in the other person an eager want.
Six ways to make people like you
Become genuinely interested in other people.
Smile.
Remember that a person's name is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language.
Be a good listener. Encourage others to talk about themselves.
Talk in terms of the other person's interests.
Make the other person feel important - and do it sincerely.
Win people to your way of thinking
The only way to get the best of an argument is to avoid it.
Show respect for the other person's opinions. Never say, "You're wrong."
If you are wrong, admit it quickly and emphatically.
Begin in a friendly way.
Get the other person saying "yes, yes" immediately.
Let the other person do a great deal of the talking.
Let the other person feel that the idea is his or hers.
Try honestly to see things from the other person's point of view.
Be sympathetic with the other person's ideas and desires.
Appeal to the nobler motives.
Dramatize your ideas.
Throw down a challenge.
Be a Leader: How to Change People Without Giving Offense or Arousing Resentment
A leader's job often includes changing your people's attitudes and behavior. Some suggestions to accomplish this:
Begin with praise and honest appreciation.
Call attention to people's mistakes indirectly.
Talk about your own mistakes before criticizing the other person.
Ask questions instead of giving direct orders.
Let the other person save face.
Praise the slightest improvement and praise every improvement. Be "hearty in your approbation and lavish in your praise."
Give the other person a fine reputation to live up to.
Use encouragement. Make the fault seem easy to correct.
Make the other person happy about doing the thing you suggest.
How is it that right now, at 9:20pm Tuesday night, I'm listening to John McCain give a victory speech and sites are already giving him New Hampshire with only 35% of the precincts reporting? Where is the math to back this up? Might not the other 65% of the state vote differently?
A while back I came across an interesting factoid about clock faces: when packaged for selling they are most often depicted at or near the time 10:10 (a quick Froogle search will help make my case if you don't believe me). There are other pages that try to answer this question and lots of theories that revolve around why this is so, ranging from the idea that 10:10 is when Abraham Lincoln died (not true) to the notion that 10:10 is the most aesthetically pleasing formation of the clock's hands (partially true).
Timex says the hands on timepieces are placed at 10:10 so the company logo on the face will be framed and not blocked by the hands. Timex says the industry standard used to be 8:20 but that looked too much like a frown and created an unhappy look.
Timex says in its ads, the clock hands are placed at 10:09 and 30 seconds, exactly.
So, at least for Timex, it's important to not obfuscate the company logo in an appealing way. Since they maintain that 8:20 "looked too much like a frown", I think it's safe to say 10:10 looks like a smile...that sounds like "Happy Time" to me. So next time you look up and see that the time is 10:10, pause for a moment and smile, like your clock is doing.
There's always been something sort of familiar about Mike Huckabee since his big win in Iowa...something I could never quite put my finger on. While watching the debates last night, though, it hit me. Good ol' Huck bears a striking resemblance to the misguided fictional President Charles Logan from 24 (played by Gregory Itzin...and I'm not the onlyonewhothinksso.
I was flipping around the TV last night and it wasn't long before I found myself watching the end of one of the newer prime-time game shows: "1 vs. 100". Yup, the show where lucky contestants try to outlast the 100-person "mob" in answering random trivia questions correctly. Last night was "Battle of the Sexes" night, and the contestant chosen to represent men everywhere in a test of wits with 100 women was young Jason Luna, who surprised us all by correctly answering a question the remaining 18 people in the mob got wrong and winning the elusive million dollar prize. It was definitely the best (and only) 5 minutes of the show I've seen.
The B-list celebrity host for this "Deal or no Deal" cousin is Bob Saget, star of " America's Funniest Home Videos " and " Full House " (though his role in " Half Baked " shattered that goofy fun-loving image of him to me forever). His site features this rap song that you listen to for a while and then realize it's about him. You read correctly, Bob Saget has a song written about (for?) him, and he's in the video too. This one was too funny not to embed...
One thing I've definitely procrastinated (see yesterday's post) is writing about an upcoming movie I am ridiculously excited about: "Cloverfield".
For those who missed the previews when they saw "Transformers" last summer (and for the rest of you who forgot to go altogether), there is a new movie coming out this month by J.J. Abrams, the creator of "Lost". At that time all we saw was a trailer that gave new meaning to the word "teaser" as the only information we got was that Abrams was the creator, it had something to do with the date 1-18-08, and the head of the Statue of Liberty was going to fly down a New York City street.
Now that's a way to start some hype.
New commercials and trailers are out, and the intrigue has only been magnified. As if the vague imagery of buildings falling, bridges collapsing, soldiers launching missiles and people exploding behind curtains wasn't enough, there is also an entirely different kind of promotion machine out there, and it exists entirely on the web as a super-viral marketing campaign.
For starters, you have 1-18-08.com, a frustratingly vague site that features a bunch of pictures, complete with timestamps and all apparently taken on...wait for it...January 18, 2008. Since it's inception users have been able to move the pictures around, and over time newer (and just as vague) abilities have been packed in. For example, if you take certain pictures like the Japanese chef and give them a quick little drag down and up you can flip them over revealing handwritten notes or, in this case, what looks to be a recipe in Japanese. The most recent addition to the site is a monstrous roar that you'll hear exactly 6:00 minutes at the site (or by just clicking the play button below).
There are countless fan/speculation sites out there (like CloverfieldClues), and if you really want to waste some time you should read the boards at the IMDB page. People go to great lengths doing things like analyzing the trailers and commercials and putting mash-ups on YouTube, most of which revolve around glimpses of the monster.
Many of the characters in the upcoming movie have MySpace pages. A fictional beverage named "Slusho" (which may or may not be an integral part of the plot) has its very own site too, as well as a slew of (odd) commercials. I wouldn't be surprised if we see an actual Slusho beverage available for purchase if the movie takes off.
Slusho's also-fictional parent company, the Tagruato Corporation, also has a site full of over-the-top detailed bogus information. There's even a site for the anti-Tagruato T.I.D.O. Wave, part of "a nonprofit, grassroots, environmental activist organization dedicated to saving our planet from the world's most nefarious corporations". Cool. Why not...
I just am really hoping the movie lives up to at least half of its hype. Oh, and please don't be Godzilla, please.
Well, it's 8:16 PM. I certainly waited long enough today to say:
HAPPY PROCRASTINATOR'S DAY 2008!
If you are at all like me, you'll find yourself sometimes waiting to do things until the last second. It's as if time speeds up the closer to a deadline you get. Below is a good illustration of what I mean (taken from a site with a more elaborate take on the idea).
Of course, there are ways to overcome procrastination, the seemingly most sensible being to set up schedules; i.e. to responsibly start and work through tasks so as to finish on time without any kind of rush near the end. Sounds good in theory, sure. Many procrastinators seem to find alternatives, however, that puts the onus of change somewhere else...namely, their clocks.
It was not that long ago that every clock in my house displayed different times, all of them fast. For my personal alarm I would close my eyes and pay attention to something else while setting the time so I wouldn't know exactly how many minutes fast it actually was. That way, when the alarm went off in the morning, I couldn't calculate what the actual time was and then rationalize another snooze cycle. The mystery of what time it actually was is what ultimately got me up, because I didn't want to be that late.
I've since gotten on board with actual time (and yes, all the clocks in the house tell the same time more or less), though the trick of not knowing how fast a clock is is still a tool commonly used by procrastinators everywhere. To make this even easier, David Seah has created The Procrastinator's Clock, as seen below. It's guaranteed to be up to 15 minutes fast, but it may be the right time, so watch out!
Well, it's New Year's Eve, and what could be more appropriate for this time of reflection than a top 10 of 2007 lists?
How about 50 of them.
TIME recently posted their "50 Top 10 Lists of 2007" complete with pictures, text blurbs, and lots of video clips, a testament to the popularity of online communities like YouTube and Google Video.
Content found on The Neoteric is of no particular genre, topic, or focus, other than it was all at some point, in some way, interesting enough to me to write about.
